***
Skip to content

Compliance, Controls & Audit Evidence

Cybersecurity Govern (Cybersecurity Governance) Compliance, Controls & Audit Evidence Cyber Risk Management Security Architecture & Standards Security Strategy & Policy Third-Party & Supply Chain Security Risk Data Flow & Lineage Mapping Security & Compliance Posture Visibility Enterprise-Spanning Regulatory Reports Enterprise Risk & Compliance Management
Cybersecurity Govern (Cybersecurity Governance) Compliance, Controls & Audit Evidence Cyber Risk Management Security Architecture & Standards Security Strategy & Policy Third-Party & Supply Chain Security Risk Data Flow & Lineage Mapping Security & Compliance Posture Visibility Enterprise-Spanning Regulatory Reports Enterprise Risk & Compliance Management
New to this diagram? Learn about the method: Use Case Tree · Use Case · Outcome

Demonstrate security compliance by mapping obligations to controls, monitoring control effectiveness, and producing audit-ready evidence with clear ownership and traceability.

Compliance work becomes high-friction when evidence is scattered and control ownership is unclear. This use case focuses on making compliance repeatable and scalable.

Outcomes

  • Faster audits with fewer disruptions to delivery teams
  • Higher confidence in control coverage and effectiveness
  • Reduced compliance risk through earlier issue detection
  • Clear traceability from obligations → controls → evidence

Typical scope

  • Obligation and control mapping (e.g., ISO, SOC2, NIS2, sector regulations)
  • Evidence collection, validation, and retention
  • Control testing and issue management
  • Reporting for executives, auditors, and regulators

GenAI-enabled execution

Agents can assemble evidence packs, draft narratives, and identify gaps by cross-referencing obligations and available artifacts—guardrailed by authoritative sources, privacy constraints, and human sign-off.